On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Robert Noland <rnol...@2hip.net> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 17:23 -0800, vehemens wrote: ... >> > I think we pissed one person off, not people, as I said, there are two >> > people registered as BSD maintainers for drm code, oga and rnoland, >> > neither of them cared. I'm not sure what value the codebase has if >> > neither Free or OpenBSD are going to use it. >> >> You pissed a number of people off, but the difference with me is that I'm not >> letting either of you get away with it. >> >> There are more then two BSD maintainers, and your statement that neither of >> them cared is not correct. > > Don't get me wrong here, I don't like the current state of things, but > given current drm development practices, this change was irrelevant. I > was a bit frustrated at the build breakage for libdrm, but krh and I > worked through that and it is now resolved.
That was my understanding of things as well. I wouldn't have dropped the linux-core or bsd-core subdirectories if there was still work going on there. Again, apologies for the build breakage and thanks for having the patience to help work it out. cheers, Kristian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel