On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Thomas Hellstrom <tho...@shipmail.org> wrote: > Jerome Glisse wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> So here is a patch which convert bo_init to use struct ttm_placement >> rather than flag. It allow the driver to give placement preference >> on where to create a bo. Also allow to create a bo at specific range >> which is i believe somethings nouveau would like to see :) >> >> Aside from the change i renamed ttm_buffer_object_init|validate to >> ttm_bo_init|validate this is shorter but also more consistent with >> others functions naming. For consistency i would like to rename >> struct ttm_buffer_object to struct ttm_bo but this lead to massive >> regular expression abuse for everyone using ttm so before proposing >> a patch let me know if you like or not this. I haven't strong >> feeling on that except that this would allow to stay in the 80 line >> lenght in some place. >> >> Cheers, >> Jerome >> >> > > Jerome, this looks good and consistent with previous changes. > > In order to get the vmwgfx driver ready for upstream in the not too distant > future we need a (temporarily) stable API. Is this patch targeted for > 2.6.33?
I'm happy to pull this into drm-core-next and make it the last API change for 2.6.33. I'd like to base vmware and nouveau merges on that TTM API and get them in ASAP. They can go into staging after merge window if necessary. Dave. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
