2010/3/12 Jerome Glisse <gli...@freedesktop.org>:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 05:24:22PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> 2010/3/11 Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com>:
>> > I like keeping all the asic definitions in one file as you tend to
>> > need to update them all at one time and having them spread across all
>> > the asic files increases the likelihood of one or more of them getting
>> > missed.  But I can live with it if other folks think it's a good idea.
>>
>> Same here. One file means easier editing. Maybe we could use some
>> other of proposed tricks?
>>
>> --
>> Rafał
>
> I don't have strong feeling but Alex has a point, right now we often
> update them, maybe we should add radeon_asic.c and move asic init
> (function now in radeon_device.c) along structure there.
>

I've seen it sugggested earlier,

Just don't use declarations in the C file, that isn't acceptable coding.

If we add radeon_asic.h make sure to include that in places that
define the functions as well.

Last thing we want is declarations to diverge by accident.

Dave.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to