> I think this was already mentioned as part of the initial reading links.
> Its quite an interesting paper.
Hmmm. If you're referring to the 'Drill reading links' thread [1] - I didn't
find it listed there.
FYI: I stumbled upon it via G+ today [2] and the earliest mentioning I was able
to track down is a Wired post from late August [3].
Cheers,
Michael
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201208.mbox/%3CCAGzKHweziabN9yhsCFUMVaAn-GL3dGauCXh6zb6kg_Xwg3xNnw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
[2] https://plus.google.com/u/0/+ResearchatGoogle/posts/UaDPdYu2q1u
[3] http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/08/google-trillion-pieces-of-data/
--
Michael Hausenblas
Ireland, Europe
http://mhausenblas.info/
On 5 Sep 2012, at 08:54, karthik tunga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this was already mentioned as part of the initial reading links.
> Its quite an interesting paper.
> The storage format (dictionary encoding) differs from dremel. The
> distributed execution is similar to dremel.
>
> Cheers,
> Karthik
>
> On 5 September 2012 03:40, Michael Hausenblas
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Just stumbled upon 'Processing a Trillion Cells per Mouse Click' [1] by
>> the Google research folks (ignoring the name, PowerDrill, for now): though
>> in-memory dependent, this might be interesting for us?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>>
>> [1] http://vldb.org/pvldb/vol5/p1436_alexanderhall_vldb2012.pdf
>>
>> --
>> Michael Hausenblas
>> Ireland, Europe
>> http://mhausenblas.info/
>>
>>
