Ted,
> Yes it is easy. It indicates what you can do if you have stuff in memory
> and have a good index.
Thanks, understood. However, I'd like to come back to my initial message and
make a more explicit proposal: 'Include PowerDrill design and insights as an
input into our design'.
As you and the other initial committers are the only ones who, ATM, *can* push
to the Git repo I'd like to learn, in addition, how the process works: is it
correct to assume that one comes up with a proposal here on the list and after
discussion (and positive resolution) one of the committers updates the
respective resources in the repo?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Hausenblas
Ireland, Europe
http://mhausenblas.info/
On 5 Sep 2012, at 15:57, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Yes it is easy. It indicates what you can do if you have stuff in memory
> and have a good index.
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Michael Hausenblas <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>> I think this was already mentioned as part of the initial reading links.
>>> Its quite an interesting paper.
>>
>>
>> Hmmm. If you're referring to the 'Drill reading links' thread [1] - I
>> didn't find it listed there.
>>
>> FYI: I stumbled upon it via G+ today [2] and the earliest mentioning I was
>> able to track down is a Wired post from late August [3].
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>>
>> [1]
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201208.mbox/%3CCAGzKHweziabN9yhsCFUMVaAn-GL3dGauCXh6zb6kg_Xwg3xNnw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> [2] https://plus.google.com/u/0/+ResearchatGoogle/posts/UaDPdYu2q1u
>> [3]
>> http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/08/google-trillion-pieces-of-data/
>>
>> --
>> Michael Hausenblas
>> Ireland, Europe
>> http://mhausenblas.info/
>>
>> On 5 Sep 2012, at 08:54, karthik tunga wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think this was already mentioned as part of the initial reading links.
>>> Its quite an interesting paper.
>>> The storage format (dictionary encoding) differs from dremel. The
>>> distributed execution is similar to dremel.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Karthik
>>>
>>> On 5 September 2012 03:40, Michael Hausenblas
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> Just stumbled upon 'Processing a Trillion Cells per Mouse Click' [1] by
>>>> the Google research folks (ignoring the name, PowerDrill, for now):
>> though
>>>> in-memory dependent, this might be interesting for us?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://vldb.org/pvldb/vol5/p1436_alexanderhall_vldb2012.pdf
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Hausenblas
>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>> http://mhausenblas.info/
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
