Thanks Ted... looks a lot to go through :( On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:
> You should read the dremel and dryad papers that Jason sent out a while > ago. > > See https://github.com/ApacheDrill/Brainstorm/wiki/Apache-Drill-Links > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:46 AM, NAVEEN MAANJU < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks Camuel. > > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > This is OpenDremel's team suggestion for one: > > > http://www.slideshare.net/CamuelGilyadov/presentations > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Michael Hausenblas < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture? > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > I was about to ask re this as well - pretty please, with sugar on top > > of > > > > it? ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Michael Hausenblas > > > > Ireland, Europe > > > > http://mhausenblas.info/ > > > > > > > > On 13 Sep 2012, at 15:23, NAVEEN MAANJU wrote: > > > > > > > > > any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture? > > > > > > > > > > +1 maven > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Arun Yadav <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> +1 for maven however, would welcome better option if any. > > > > >> On Sep 13, 2012 2:45 AM, "Ben Flint" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> +1 for maven. Gradle wouldn't be bad either if it's flexibility > > > we're > > > > >>> after. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On 9/12/12 1:53 PM, "Vladimir Klimontovich" < > > [email protected]> > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> I guess ant is good too if it's used together with ivy. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Camuel Gilyadov < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>> What is wrong with good old Ant? > > > > >>>>> I can live with maven too... it just has too many gotchas > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On 9/12/12, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> +1 for maven. > > > > >>>>>> Could those against please suggest alternatives? > > > > >>>>>> Thank you > > > > >>>>>> Julien > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Camuel Gilyadov < > > > [email protected]> > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> -1 for maven. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> On 9/12/12, Constantine Peresypkin <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>> If build system is evil it's better to build it manually. > > > > >>>>>>>> -1 for maven > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas < > > > > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what > about > > > the > > > > >>>>>>>>>> build > > > > >>>>>>>>> system for drill? > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java > IMO). > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels > like > > it > > > > >>>>>>> downloads > > > > >>>>>>>>> half of the Internet every time). > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about > Scala > > + > > > > >> SBT > > > > >>>>>>>>> [1]? > > > > >>>>>>>>> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more > productive > > > ;) > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > >>>>>>>>> Michael > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/ > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>>>> Michael Hausenblas > > > > >>>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe > > > > >>>>>>>>> http://mhausenblas.info/ > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what > about > > > the > > > > >>>>>>>>>> build > > > > >>>>>>>>> system for drill? > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java > IMO). > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> -david > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning < > > > > >> [email protected]> > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I see classes in the source tree: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>> > > > > > > https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/ > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/dr > > > > >>>>>>> qlantlr/autogen > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr source > > > code > > > > >>>>>>> into > > > > >>>>>>> an > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> antler source tree. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Still work in progress, but anyway - > > > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>> Sent from my mobile device > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > >>>>> Sent from my mobile device > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> -- > > > > >>>> Vladimir Klimontovich > > > > >>>> Cell: +7-926-890-2349, skype: klimontovich > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
