This is OpenDremel's team suggestion for one: http://www.slideshare.net/CamuelGilyadov/presentations
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Michael Hausenblas < [email protected]> wrote: > > > any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture? > > +1 > > I was about to ask re this as well - pretty please, with sugar on top of > it? ;) > > > Cheers, > Michael > > -- > Michael Hausenblas > Ireland, Europe > http://mhausenblas.info/ > > On 13 Sep 2012, at 15:23, NAVEEN MAANJU wrote: > > > any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture? > > > > +1 maven > > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Arun Yadav <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> +1 for maven however, would welcome better option if any. > >> On Sep 13, 2012 2:45 AM, "Ben Flint" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 for maven. Gradle wouldn't be bad either if it's flexibility we're > >>> after. > >>> > >>> On 9/12/12 1:53 PM, "Vladimir Klimontovich" <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I guess ant is good too if it's used together with ivy. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> What is wrong with good old Ant? > >>>>> I can live with maven too... it just has too many gotchas > >>>>> > >>>>> On 9/12/12, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> +1 for maven. > >>>>>> Could those against please suggest alternatives? > >>>>>> Thank you > >>>>>> Julien > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Camuel Gilyadov <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> -1 for maven. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 9/12/12, Constantine Peresypkin <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> If build system is evil it's better to build it manually. > >>>>>>>> -1 for maven > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas < > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the > >>>>>>>>>> build > >>>>>>>>> system for drill? > >>>>>>>>>> I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO). > >>>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels like it > >>>>>>> downloads > >>>>>>>>> half of the Internet every time). > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about Scala + > >> SBT > >>>>>>>>> [1]? > >>>>>>>>> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more productive ;) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>> Michael > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Michael Hausenblas > >>>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe > >>>>>>>>> http://mhausenblas.info/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the > >>>>>>>>>> build > >>>>>>>>> system for drill? > >>>>>>>>>> I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO). > >>>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -david > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning < > >> [email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I see classes in the source tree: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/ > >>> > >>>>>> > parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/dr > >>>>>>> qlantlr/autogen > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr source code > >>>>>>> into > >>>>>>> an > >>>>>>>>>>> antler source tree. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov > >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Still work in progress, but anyway - > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Sent from my mobile device > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Sent from my mobile device > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Vladimir Klimontovich > >>>> Cell: +7-926-890-2349, skype: klimontovich > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
