On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Oct 15, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have been saying "logical plan" for the (hopefully) universal > > representation that comes out of the parser plus some semantic steps. > > Jason and Julian have indicated that a more standard term would be > > "physical plan". I am happy to switch the plan doc to standard > > nomenclature. > > I'd appreciate that. Of course one man's physical is another woman's > logical, but I found myself tongue-tied when trying to use your > nomenclature. > Fixed. Thanks for the input. > > Along similar lines, it appears that database articles have DAG's that > flow > > upwards. I have been drawing them downwards simply because that is the > > default in Omnigraffle. I can invert and draw them going upwards if it > is > > the consensus that it matters/is preferable. > > I don't mind. (In ETL tools the data flows left-to-right. I can adapt to > anything.) > I will leave it, then.
