What about the other diagonal drill? Seems more artistic to me. On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Michael Hausenblas < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > Tomer seems to have created or had created a drill logo for the bay area > > users' group. See > > http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-Apache-Drill-User-Group/in the upper > > left. > > > > What is the sense of the group about whether this or something like it > > should be our logo? I don't really want to have a month-long discussion > of > > a logo, but we should have one eventually and deciding early is probably > > easier than later. > > > > Associated with that, is there a bright spark who feels that they could > do > > lots better? If so, have at it and let's discuss the options. > > Good enough for now, hence +1 … > > I've adopted it at: > > * G+ page https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/106081196028708015488/ > * http://drill-user.org/ > > Note: Tomer, when you get around, please provide us with a high-res > version via the repo - this one I'm currently using is really utterly > shitty, resolution-wise ;) > > Cheers, > Michael > > -- > Michael Hausenblas > Ireland, Europe > http://mhausenblas.info/ > > On 15 Oct 2012, at 23:36, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > Three questions here, none of which have to do with technical substance. > > > > ----- Branding ----- > > > > Tomer seems to have created or had created a drill logo for the bay area > > users' group. See > > http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-Apache-Drill-User-Group/in the upper > > left. > > > > What is the sense of the group about whether this or something like it > > should be our logo? I don't really want to have a month-long discussion > of > > a logo, but we should have one eventually and deciding early is probably > > easier than later. > > > > Associated with that, is there a bright spark who feels that they could > do > > lots better? If so, have at it and let's discuss the options. > > > > > > ----- Technical ----- > > > > I have been saying "logical plan" for the (hopefully) universal > > representation that comes out of the parser plus some semantic steps. > > Jason and Julian have indicated that a more standard term would be > > "physical plan". I am happy to switch the plan doc to standard > > nomenclature. > > > > What say ye all? > > > > Along similar lines, it appears that database articles have DAG's that > flow > > upwards. I have been drawing them downwards simply because that is the > > default in Omnigraffle. I can invert and draw them going upwards if it > is > > the consensus that it matters/is preferable. > > > > What say ye to this? > >
