I'm really curious why none of this is on the Drill JIRA or in it's version
control.

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:

> - There have been several proposals for syntax conventions for the logical
> plan language.  Three versions have been built.  I built a version along
> the lines of LLVM and a JSON based version that used a constructor
> convention along with tight binding of classes to operator types.  Jacques
> built a version on Jackson which used much looser binding and supported DAG
> structuring much more easily.  Overall, I feel that Jacques implementation
> dominates the ones that I have done in essentially every way.  I think we
> should go with his style.
>




-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Reply via email to