Well, much of it is in JIRA. The fact that it isn't in the version control is what I was referring to when I mentioned the lack of commit-often behavior.
The logical plan parser is committed already, but none of the interpreter work is committed. Jacques is working off of a private git clone and I have been pushing for more frequent pushes to a visible repo where I can echo his work into the sandbox, but I have had little effect in that regard so far. On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm really curious why none of this is on the Drill JIRA or in it's version > control. > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > - There have been several proposals for syntax conventions for the > logical > > plan language. Three versions have been built. I built a version along > > the lines of LLVM and a JSON based version that used a constructor > > convention along with tight binding of classes to operator types. > Jacques > > built a version on Jackson which used much looser binding and supported > DAG > > structuring much more easily. Overall, I feel that Jacques > implementation > > dominates the ones that I have done in essentially every way. I think we > > should go with his style. > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
