Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
>
>> "political" considerations, and I think Sun's business concerns and
>> the concerns of the open source community may not be well aligned on
>> this issue.
>
> Right, so unless LSI speak to the community, there needs to be some
> indirect communication, so how about this strategy:
>
> We give Sun's "political" forces until 2nd week of Jan 2008 to come up
> with integration schedule for LSI's native driver, James McPherson
> acting as a middleman between Sun mgmt and the community.
>
> Said schedule should not extend beyond the community set deadline for
> the preliminary RTI, say 2 months after their response (2nd week of
> Mar 2008).
>
> Meanwhile, James & Co proceed with testing and code review for David's
> driver. If Sun+LSI do not file their RTI by deadline, James files a
> PSARC fast track and, 1 week later, an ON RTI.
Sounds great. I'm not sure how you get the Sun "political forces" to
sign up to this, but good luck.
The manager you need to talk to is Patrick Greene. He's the manager
that owns the relationship with LSI.
-- Garrett
_______________________________________________
driver-discuss mailing list
driver-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
