On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Richard Lowe wrote: > "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Dec 26, 2007, at 1:04 AM, Alan DuBoff wrote: >>> The ARC is still the deciding factor of allowing something from >>> even being >>> able to go in. >> >> No, the ARC has no such function for opensolaris. The people in the >> community here can vote on the basis of a review from an ARC, but that >> is no substitute for decisions made by the community. > > Depending on how I interpret that, I think I disagree. Casting aside > sound architecture based on a popular vote is broken and wrong.
I was stating it as a generic term for the process, my bad, but the process can prevent any putback. > That said, I still firmly believe the development process needs to be > separated from any political/corporate considerations, that isn't the > same as how I interpret what you say above, however. Yes, I think most are in agreement, but I see the difficulty in having a lot of various processes that have a stake today. It's taking time to sort out, some folks are getting grey hairs of it...:-/ -- Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 IHV/OEM Group _______________________________________________ driver-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
