I've a file of function definitions say xxx.h. This file is included and
used in other n files. Earlier this definition was static inline yyyy(){}.
Now after removing static this complains as "static unused"

---Reang.

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Garrett D'Amore <[email protected]> wrote:

> Reang Su wrote:
>
>> Hi Garrett,
>>  I tried without using /*LINTED */ initially, it didn't work. After
>> removing static from my function definition I was still getting "warning:
>> static unused", So I tried with /*LINTED */.
>> Unfortunately this also didn't work.
>>
>
> Lint pass two over a whole program might notice that the function is not
> used.  But if its a device driver, it should get by if you remove the
> static, without a LINTED flag.  The behavior you're describing is not one
> I've ever seen.
>
> But again, if the function is static, and *not* used, then why have it in
> the first place?
>
>   - Garrett
>
>>  Thank you,
>> --Reang.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Garrett D'Amore <[email protected]<mailto:
>> [email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>    Reang Su wrote:
>>
>>        Hi ,
>>         I'm stuck while removing E_STATIC_UNUSED LINTTAG from my
>>        driver Makefile.
>>         Once I removed this LINTTAG in my Makefile I get following
>>        warning.
>>        xxx.h", line 85: warning: static unused:
>>        __hal_ifmsg_is_manager_up (E_STATIC_UNUSED)
>>         I removed static from my function definition and added
>>        /*LINTED */ before it. Now I get
>>         E_SUPPRESSION_DIRECTIVE_UNUSED on that line.
>>         xxx.h", line 85: warning: lint suppression directive not used
>>        (E_SUPPRESSION_DIRECTIVE_UNUSED)
>>
>>
>>    You shouldn't have also added /*LINTED*/.  Since you removed the
>>    "static", you shouldn't have got the E_STATIC_UNUSED_LINTTAG anymore.
>>
>>    Of course, if the function really was static, and not used
>>    anywhere, maybe you should have just removed it, and saved a
>>    little space in the code and in the binary.
>>
>>      - Garrett
>>
>>         Please suggest.
>>         Thank you,
>>         -Reang,
>>
>>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>        _______________________________________________
>>        driver-discuss mailing list
>>        [email protected]
>>        <mailto:[email protected]>
>>        http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
driver-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss

Reply via email to