Hi All, Finally I was able to fix the issue. Few of the things I did:
a) Have definition and declaration in separate file ( Basic requirement :-) ). b) For fast path used pragma directives for inline functions. Thank you all, ---Reang. On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Steven Stallion <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:01:24 -0400, Sebastien Roy <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Putting a static declaration in a header file is bad form; anything that > > includes this header file but doesn't happen to use this static symbol > > will end up with a lint warning. > > > > The fix is to move the static declaration to the .c file where it's > > actually defined and used. > > +1 > > There are a number of additional rules as well when it comes to using > inlines; primarily, if you are declaring a static inline, then the > definition *must* be within the same translation unit as the declaration. > By placing this into a header, you are essentially forcing every bit of > source which includes it to provide a static definition (code duplication). > If this is not done, the compiler should complain (loudly) - at that point > you can either make the inline extern (yech), or move the declaration back > into the translation unit where it belongs. > > Steve >
_______________________________________________ driver-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
