On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Dan Mick <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I'd always favoured a consolidation such as this, but without the ON >> > consolidation private interfaces. That way it would not have to have >> the >> > build-for-build correspondence with ON. >> > >> >> Actually, the primary attraction to an IHV is the build-for-build >> correspondence to ON, which allows the use of consolidation private >> interfaces like GLDv3. Otherwise, we could just offer drivers from >> our own download site. > > Well.... > > the right answer is to make GLDv3 public.
That won't help the group within sun to open ce, or to port it to gldv3, or to let the community create a nemo-ized replacement (that Sun will allow to be putback to ON) (as one example). > > Anyone remember the Platform consolidation, and Driver Updates? > > > _______________________________________________ > driver-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss > _______________________________________________ driver-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
