On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> The i.MX Image Processing Unit (IPU) contains a number of image processing
> blocks that sit right in the middle between DRM and V4L2. Some of the modules,
> such as Display Controller, Processor, and Interface (DC, DP, DI) or CMOS
> Sensor Interface (CSI) and their FIFOs could be assigned to either framework,
> but others, such as the dma controller (IDMAC) and image converter (IC) can
> be used by both.
> The IPUv3 core driver provides an internal API to access the modules, to be
> used by both DRM and V4L2 IPUv3 drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.st...@pengutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
> drivers/{staging/imx-drm => gpu}/ipu-v3/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/{staging/imx-drm => gpu}/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/{staging/imx-drm => gpu}/ipu-v3/ipu-dc.c | 3 +--
> drivers/{staging/imx-drm => gpu}/ipu-v3/ipu-di.c | 2 +-
> drivers/{staging/imx-drm => gpu}/ipu-v3/ipu-dmfc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/{staging/imx-drm => gpu}/ipu-v3/ipu-dp.c | 2 +-
> drivers/{staging/imx-drm => gpu}/ipu-v3/ipu-prv.h | 2 +-
The posted diff only shows the changes made during the move.
Has the actual code been reviewed here?
If not, please post it here (e.g. diff against /dev/null).
If yes, please ignore my comments.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
