Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 09:38:04AM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Jes Sorensen <jes.soren...@redhat.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jes.soren...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c | 9 +++++----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
>> b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
>> index dc044cf..eb747d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
>> @@ -383,13 +383,14 @@ ConstructNullFunctionData(struct rtw_adapter
>> *padapter, u8 *pframe,
>> }
>>
>> if (bQoS == true) {
>> - struct ieee80211_qos_hdr *pwlanqoshdr;
>> + struct ieee80211_qos_hdr *qoshdr;
>> + qoshdr = (struct ieee80211_qos_hdr *)pframe;
>
> Checkpatch complains about these nowadays.
>
> It's obviously a minor thing. No need to resend. No need to respond to
> this email at all, in fact.
Sorry you baffled me there - it complains about what here?
Cheers,
Jes
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
