On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, 敬锐 wrote:
>
> On 01/18/2015 07:13 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static void rts5249_force_power_down(struct rtsx_pcr
> >> *pcr, u8 pm_state)
> >> > rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, AUTOLOAD_CFG_BASE + 3, 0x01, 0);
> >> >
> >> > if (pm_state == HOST_ENTER_S3) {
> >> >- if (PCI_PID(pcr) == 0x524A)
> >> >+ if (PCI_PID(pcr) == 0x524A || PCI_PID(pcr) == 0x525A)
> > Shouldn't these be defined somewhere?
> >
> > I have a particular distaste for magic numbers.
> >
> This is the chip ID number, no need define, just using it.
> if we define, it will like RTS525A_PCI_ID, so bad.
Looks good. Please do that.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
