On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 10:42 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:43:14AM +0200, Fabio Falzoi wrote: > > No newline is needed since checkpatch doesn't complain about line longer > > than 80 characters for string literals. [] > The original was correct.
The original was fine. > There was no need to go over 80 characters > just because of a limitation in checkpatch. How is checkpatch not emitting a message on either form a limitation? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
