On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 05:37:16 PM Julia Lawall wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c 
> > b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c
> > index 83d4bca..1ded691 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c
> > @@ -204,13 +204,13 @@ static inline char *translate_scan(struct _adapter 
> > *padapter,
> >     /* Add the protocol name */
> >     iwe.cmd = SIOCGIWNAME;
> >     if ((r8712_is_cckratesonly_included(pnetwork->network.
> > -        SupportedRates)) == true) {
> > +        rates)) == true) {
> >             if (ht_cap == true)
> >                     snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11bn");
> >             else
> >                     snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11b");
> >     } else if ((r8712_is_cckrates_included(pnetwork->network.
> > -               SupportedRates)) == true) {
> > +               rates)) == true) {
> >             if (ht_cap == true)
> >                     snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11bgn");
> >             else
> 
> The placement of the line breaks here is partucularly unpleasant.  Perhaps
> that could be adjusted now that the field name is shorter.  Theer may be
> some other cases in the patch where the line breaks could be adjusted to
> improve readability.
> 
> julia
I agree. Dan Carpenter earlier complained about me fixing up the lines
while changing the variable name. Should that be a separate patch?

-- 
~Joshua Clayton
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to