On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 06:56:38 PM Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 08:50:04AM -0700, Joshua Clayton wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 05:37:16 PM Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c
> > > > b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c
> > > > index 83d4bca..1ded691 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c
> > > > @@ -204,13 +204,13 @@ static inline char *translate_scan(struct
> > > > _adapter *padapter,
> > > > /* Add the protocol name */
> > > > iwe.cmd = SIOCGIWNAME;
> > > > if ((r8712_is_cckratesonly_included(pnetwork->network.
> > > > - SupportedRates)) == true) {
> > > > + rates)) == true) {
> > > > if (ht_cap == true)
> > > > snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11bn");
> > > > else
> > > > snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11b");
> > > > } else if ((r8712_is_cckrates_included(pnetwork->network.
> > > > - SupportedRates)) == true) {
> > > > + rates)) == true) {
> > > > if (ht_cap == true)
> > > > snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE
> > > > 802.11bgn");
> > > > else
> > >
> > > The placement of the line breaks here is partucularly unpleasant. Perhaps
> > > that could be adjusted now that the field name is shorter. Theer may be
> > > some other cases in the patch where the line breaks could be adjusted to
> > > improve readability.
> > >
> > > julia
> > I agree. Dan Carpenter earlier complained about me fixing up the lines
> > while changing the variable name. Should that be a separate patch?
> >
>
> Changing the line breaks here is a tiny change on the same line and so
> it's fine. It fits into the one thing per patch rule.
This is the style I prefer (getting rid of the explicit == true)
- if ((r8712_is_cckratesonly_included(pnetwork->network.
- SupportedRates)) == true) {
+ if (r8712_is_cckratesonly_included(pnetwork->network.rates)) {
if (ht_cap == true)
snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11bn");
else
snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11b");
- } else if ((r8712_is_cckrates_included(pnetwork->network.
- SupportedRates)) == true) {
+ } else if (r8712_is_cckrates_included(pnetwork->network.rates)) {
if (ht_cap == true)
snprintf(iwe.u.name, IFNAMSIZ, "IEEE 802.11bgn");
Does that look ok?
If we keep the "== true" and the extra set of parentheses, the "else if" case
goes over 80 lines.
I will happily submit the change as follow up patch if that is too much to
change at once.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
--
~Joshua Clayton
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
