On October 27, 2015 4:40:42 PM GMT+05:30, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> wrote: >On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:45:18AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Dan Carpenter >> <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> wrote: >> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Muhammad Falak R Wani >> >> <falakre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Please follow standard naming convention for the patches. >> >> It should be [PATCH v2 1/4] and not [PATCH 1/4 v2]. >> > >> > Does this matter? It's in a thread so it sorts fine either way. >> It will be wise if people read guides and follow examples. >> >> [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches > >That document doesn't really specify one way or the other. And even if >it did then why would you care? Stop being so picky for no reason. > >regards, >dan carpenter
Sorry, my bad . Won't repeat such mistakes. -- mfrw _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
