> From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net]
> 
> From: Dexuan Cui <de...@microsoft.com>
> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 01:35:51 +0000
> 
> > +static struct sock *hvsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
> > +                             gfp_t priority, unsigned short type)
> > +{
> > +   struct hvsock_sock *hvsk;
> > +   struct sock *sk;
> > +
> > +   sk = sk_alloc(net, AF_HYPERV, priority, &hvsock_proto, 0);
> > +   if (!sk)
> > +           return NULL;
>  ...
> > +   /* Looks stream-based socket doesn't need this. */
> > +   sk->sk_backlog_rcv = NULL;
> > +
> > +   sk->sk_state = 0;
> > +   sock_reset_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE);
> 
> All of these are unnecessary initializations, since sk_alloc() zeroes
> out the 'sk' object for you.

Hi David,
Thanks for the comment!  I'll remove the 3 lines.

May I know if you have more comments?

BTW, during the past month, at least 7 other people also reviewed
the patch and gave me quite a few good comments, which have
been addressed. Though only one of them gave the Reviewed-by
line for now, I guess I would get more if I ping them to have a look
at the latest version of the patch, i.e., v19 -- I'm going to post it
with the aforementioned 3 lines removed and if you've more 
comments, I'm ready to address them too. :-)

Thanks,
-- Dexuan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to