> From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net] > ... > From: Dexuan Cui <de...@microsoft.com> > Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 03:09:16 +0000 > > > BTW, during the past month, at least 7 other people also reviewed > > the patch and gave me quite a few good comments, which have > > been addressed. > > Correction: Several people gave coding style and simple corrections > to your patch. > > Very few gave any review of the _SUBSTANCE_ of your changes. > > And the one of the few who did, and suggested you build your > facilities using the existing S390 hypervisor socket infrastructure, > you brushed off _IMMEDIATELY_. > > That drives me crazy. The one person who gave you real feedback > you basically didn't consider seriously at all.
Hi David, I'm very sorry -- I guess I must have missed something here -- I don't remember somebody replied with S390 hypervisor socket infrastructure... I'm re-reading all the replies, trying to locate the reply and I'll find out why I didn't take it seriously. Sorry in advance. > I know why you don't want to consider alternative implementations, > and it's because you guys have so much invested in what you've > implemented already. This is not true. I'm absolutely open to any possibility to have an alternative better implementation. Please allow me to find the "S390 hypervisor socket infrastructure" reply first and I'll report back ASAP. > But that's tough and not our problem. > > And until this changes, yes, this submission will be stuck in the > mud and continue slogging on like this. I definitely agree and understand. Thanks, -- Dexuan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
