On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:50:12AM +0100, Christian Gromm wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:00:57 +0100
> Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:48:32PM -0700, Jason Litzinger wrote:
> > > > This is fine, but the fact that the most subsystem feels like it has to
> > > > have its own attribute type is the big problem with this file, that
> > > > should not be needed at all, and hopefully will be fixed up someday soon
> > > > (i.e. it's a requirement before it can get out of staging...)
> 
> That's interesting. We still need to set up a strategy to get this driver
> out of staging one day, as we decided on the ELCE 2015 in Dublin. A good
> starting point would be a list of requirements that need to be met to
> achieve this goal.
> 
> Does this make sense?

Yes, and starting with cleaning up the kobject mess would be a good
first item for that list :)

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to