This was done to conform to the Lustre Coding Guidelines. -Ben
On 12/10/16, 1:14 PM, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 01:05:59PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: >> From: Ben Evans <bev...@cray.com> >> >> It was found if you sort the headers alphabetically >> that it reduced patch conflicts. This patch sorts >> the headers alphabetically and also place linux >> header first, then uapi header and finally the >> lustre kernel headers. > >I still don't agree, when did you last have a patch conflict with this >file in the .h section? And exactly how hard was it to fix it up? > >I'm all for cleanups, but really, this is useless. And I said so the >last time you sent it... > >greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
