On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 08:19:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:31:16AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
>  @@ -610,12 +610,7 @@ static void ks_sdio_interrupt(struct sdio_func *func)
> >                             if (atomic_read(&priv->psstatus.status) == 
> > PS_SNOOZE) {
> >                                     if (cnt_txqbody(priv)) {
> >                                             ks_wlan_hw_wakeup_request(priv);
> > -                                           queue_delayed_work
> > -                                                   (priv->ks_wlan_hw.
> > -                                                           ks7010sdio_wq,
> > -                                                           
> > &priv->ks_wlan_hw.
> > -                                                           rw_wq, 1);
> > -                                           return;
> > +                                           goto intr_out_with_delay;
> 
> 
> The original code is crap but this isn't really an improvement.  We've
> just used a goto to split the code up randomly so it's hard to read.

Righto, let's drop this one and I will come back to it when I
understand the module enough to remove the ifdef 0

thanks,
Tobin.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to