On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 08:10:44AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 08:19:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:31:16AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > @@ -610,12 +610,7 @@ static void ks_sdio_interrupt(struct sdio_func *func)
> > > if (atomic_read(&priv->psstatus.status) ==
> > > PS_SNOOZE) {
> > > if (cnt_txqbody(priv)) {
> > > ks_wlan_hw_wakeup_request(priv);
> > > - queue_delayed_work
> > > - (priv->ks_wlan_hw.
> > > - ks7010sdio_wq,
> > > -
> > > &priv->ks_wlan_hw.
> > > - rw_wq, 1);
> > > - return;
> > > + goto intr_out_with_delay;
> >
> >
> > The original code is crap but this isn't really an improvement. We've
> > just used a goto to split the code up randomly so it's hard to read.
>
> Righto, let's drop this one and I will come back to it when I
> understand the module enough to remove the ifdef 0
We traditionally remove ifdef 0 code without even thinking about it.
It's in git history if anyone wants to revive it.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
