Hi Petr,
Petr Machata <pe...@mellanox.com> writes:
> -static int __vlan_vid_add(struct net_device *dev, struct net_bridge *br,
> - u16 vid, u16 flags)
> +static int br_switchdev_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid, u16
> flags)
> {
> struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan v = {
> .obj.orig_dev = dev,
> @@ -89,12 +88,29 @@ static int __vlan_vid_add(struct net_device *dev, struct
> net_bridge *br,
> .vid_begin = vid,
> .vid_end = vid,
> };
> - int err;
>
> + return switchdev_port_obj_add(dev, &v.obj);
> +}
> +
> +static int br_switchdev_port_obj_del(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid)
> +{
> + struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan v = {
> + .obj.orig_dev = dev,
> + .obj.id = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN,
> + .vid_begin = vid,
> + .vid_end = vid,
> + };
> +
> + return switchdev_port_obj_del(dev, &v.obj);
> +}
Shouldn't they be br_switchdev_port_vlan_add (or similar) implemented in
net/bridge/br_switchdev.c instead, since they are VLAN specific?
Other than that, the change looks good!
Thanks,
Vivien
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
