From: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 09:45:34 -0800
> Based on discussion with Ido and feedback from Jakub there are clearly > two classes of users that implement SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PARENT_ID: > > - PF/VF drivers which typically only implement return the port's parent > ID, yet have to implement switchdev_port_attr_get() just for that > > - Ethernet switch drivers: mlxsw, ocelot, DSA, etc. which implement more > attributes which we want to be able to eventually veto in the context > of the caller, thus making them candidates for using a blocking notifier > chain > > Changes in v4: .. Series applied, thanks Florian. I'll push this out to net-next after my build tests complete. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
