From: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 13:50:50 -0800 (PST)
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 09:45:34 -0800 > >> Based on discussion with Ido and feedback from Jakub there are clearly >> two classes of users that implement SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PARENT_ID: >> >> - PF/VF drivers which typically only implement return the port's parent >> ID, yet have to implement switchdev_port_attr_get() just for that >> >> - Ethernet switch drivers: mlxsw, ocelot, DSA, etc. which implement more >> attributes which we want to be able to eventually veto in the context >> of the caller, thus making them candidates for using a blocking notifier >> chain >> >> Changes in v4: > .. > > Series applied, thanks Florian. > > I'll push this out to net-next after my build tests complete. I had to remove the unused variable 'rocker' to kill a warning introduced by patch #8. Just FYI... _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
