On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:25:09AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Joe rightly points out that we should be using the "Obsolete" status for
> these two subsystems.

Even with that change, I don't see get_maintainers.pl tell me I
shouldn't be sending a patch in for this area:


$ cat x.patch
diff --git a/drivers/staging/uwb/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/uwb/Kconfig
index 259e053e1e09..d9658c46686e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/uwb/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/staging/uwb/Kconfig
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
 # UWB device configuration
 #

+
+
 menuconfig UWB
        tristate "Ultra Wideband devices"
        default n
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl x.patch
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> (supporter:STAGING 
SUBSYSTEM,commit_signer:2/2=100%,authored:1/2=50%)
Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%)
de...@driverdev.osuosl.org (open list:ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) SUBSYSTEM:)
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org (open list)


Am I missing something?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to