Hi!
On Aug 17, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Giuseppe Maxia wrote:
first step, i.e. to build a binary tarball, and to manually create a
Just to be forward, you are not planning on publishing the binaries
just yet right? I would prefer that you do not because I do not want
folks to have an expectation of support yet.
* the replacement for drizzled_safe (which is currently badly broken).
Monty said something about creating an angel, but I don't know the
time frame;
My take on this, is that it should be fixed. From what Monty has told
me it has blossomed in recent years in size. I am wondering if we
would not have more luck with an older version or if I should just ask
Yazz or someone else to build us a new one quickly.
* a script to create standard binary tarballs (I did something that
works for me and I can push it into a tree unless there are already
plans to do it in some specific way);
I might be interested in seeing this in the Makefile, though there is
a strong argument that tarball binaries are the way of the dodo. I
keep "make rpm" in my other projects because I find it to be useful. I
am wondering if tarballs are the same.
* instructions to compile drizzle with static libraries;
This will never work. Static built binaries are dodos at this point.
There have been excellent articles written on this in recent time.
* instructions to start replication with drizzle (if it is currently
possible).
I think it is broken, and I believe we should fix it :)
Cheers,
-Brian
--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
