On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:39:42 +0800, ZQ <[email protected]> wrote: > You once mentioned one thing I can do is to replace load file with this my > file system storage engine, > do you mean I should abstract some general code from my storage engine and > plug it into load file code path? > I would like to know what's the potential problem with the original load > file functionality?
Hi! Basically, I don't think we need two blocks of code doing relatively similar things. I think we can replace the LOAD DATA INFILE with some code that does the following: - create temporary table using filesystem_engine - open target table - open temporary table - read row from temporary table - write row to target table - repeat until done - close tables. -- Stewart Smith _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
