On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:50 AM, ZQ <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Stewart Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:39:42 +0800, ZQ <[email protected]> wrote: >> > You once mentioned one thing I can do is to replace load file with this >> > my >> > file system storage engine, >> > do you mean I should abstract some general code from my storage engine >> > and >> > plug it into load file code path? >> > I would like to know what's the potential problem with the original load >> > file functionality? >> >> following the existing code to do LOAD DATA INFILE shouldn't be *too* >> hard, and some can probably be pretty easily reused. > > Then I'm afraid some of the code in filesystem storage will be moved to the > kernel in drizzle. > Finishing the basics of LOAD DATA INFILE is not hard, but to accomplish all > the requirements is a little tricky especially for these > ENCLOSING/ESCAPED_BY (I have a hard time to figure them out...) > --Zimin
Does Drizzle need all the featues of LOAD DATA INFILE? COPY in pg is much more basic and works fine... -- Rob Wultsch [email protected] _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
