Hi David, On 20/01/11 20:02, David Murphy wrote:
Yeah I was trying to test the current version which has not yet been made into RPM's
Sure, but what I meant was we have the required Boost RPMs in that repository too if do you want to compile it yourself (and I have now noted this in the wiki for the RHEL5 instructions). I have also filed a bug to get compilation documentation written for http://docs.drizzle.org/ at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705576
also that error might be more helpful its , "Is boot new enough (1.40 required) ... no" . Then doing a simple rpm -qa | grep boost -i you would see oh im on only 1.33 not 1.40 .
>
Just a thought to make things more friendly when someone one el5 after release goes to compile it and says but I have boost installed. Alternativly something like Boost installed: 1.33>= 1.40 ... no would be even cleaner IMHO
That may be harder to do, Monty Taylor would know better than me since he designed out build system, but we can put out quite a verbose message there saying why there is a problem.
Kind Regards -- Andrew Hutchings - LinuxJedi - http://www.linuxjedi.co.uk/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
