I wanted to gather feedback on how you/we want to layout the RPM repository on
rpms.drizzle.org. In preparation of a some day 'drizzle8' we need to keep the
package sets in separate repos to avoid clashing (i.e. the libdrizzle package).
The following is what I was going to do:
7-dev
7-testing
7-stable
And in the future:
7-dev
7-testing
7-stable
8-dev
8-testing
8-stable
In the repo this would look like:
7-dev
`-> fedora
`-> 13
`-> i386
`-> x86_64
`-> 14
`-> i386
`-> x86_64
`-> 15
`-> i386
`-> x86_64
`-> redhat
`-> 5
`-> i386
`-> x86_64
`-> 6
`-> i386
`-> x86_64
Same for '7-testing' and '7-stable'. The 'dev' repo are the bi-monthly
releases. The 'testing' repo is the 'on deck' next GA release... and 'stable'
is the current GA release. Does anyone have any thoughts on this before I get
started?
---
derks
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
