So, I am a bit unsure how to handle libdrizzle (1.0) vs. libdrizzle-2.0. Is libdrizzle-2.0 what we want 3rd party software to build against at this stage, or is it only for development purposes? Reason I ask is... as far as packaging goes... if '2.0' is stable and what we want people to build against... then I would want that to be the libdrizzle package... and make 'libdrizzle1' available for backward compat... however, if 2.0 is still in development or not stable and we want people to build against libdrizzle-1.0... then I need to keep 'libdrizzle' as 1.0, and 'libdrizzle2' for *forward* compatibility.
Hope that makes sense. --- BJ Dierkes, RHCE Linux Systems Engineer IV - [RH]acker OS Deployment Team, RPM Development Rackspace Hosting _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
