On Wed, 4 May 2011 17:44:15 -0500, BJ Dierkes <[email protected]> wrote: > I am a bit unsure how to handle libdrizzle (1.0) vs. libdrizzle-2.0. > Is libdrizzle-2.0 what we want 3rd party software to build against at > this stage, or is it only for development purposes? Reason I ask > is... as far as packaging goes... if '2.0' is stable and what we want > people to build against... then I would want that to be the libdrizzle > package... and make 'libdrizzle1' available for backward > compat... however, if 2.0 is still in development or not stable and we > want people to build against libdrizzle-1.0... then I need to keep > 'libdrizzle' as 1.0, and 'libdrizzle2' for *forward* compatibility.
2.0 is still in development, 1.0 is stable. -- Stewart Smith _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
