Hi, On Dec 8, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Daniel Nichter wrote:
> Hingo said in another thread that DRIZZLE_DECLARE_PLUGIN is newer, but I > prefer DRIZZLE_PLUGIN because it's shorter and forces all the plugin's > metadata (authors, version, etc.) into its plugin.ini, and since I don't > think we can get rid of the plugin.ini, it seems logical to me to centralize > metadata in it. I am fan of it being in the source file. My reason is that historically I find that projects churn module/plugin API's with some frequency. Keeping it in source makes it easy to port to whatever the current flavor of interface is without much effort. Cheers, -Brian
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
