Hi, On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Daniel Nichter wrote:
> I've been attempting to benchmark Drizzle on a Cisco C250 (6 core/12 > thread/24 CPU; 346G RAM, FusionIO 320GB MLC card) but Drizzle's InnoDB is old > and has a bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/drizzle/+bug/911948) which causes > sysbench to crash it. I've spoken with others about updating InnoDB. Stewart > said he had scripts to do this. Once this is fixed, I'll put belief to the > test. :-) Have you tried to remove the assertion? FWIW I am not sure about the current state of Drizzle vs MySQL performance. I know what it was with the prior GA of MySQL, but I don't know about the current one. I wouldn't be surprised if we were slower without an updated Innodb, but that is an assumption I am making based on a couple of lock changes in Innodb within recent time. I feel pretty sure that the kernel is still a bit faster. I have a new 64core box on its way, so with a little bit of luck I will be able to see what we look like with that many cores. Cheers, -Brian
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
