On 01/29/2012 09:46 PM, Mark Atwood wrote:
Hi!
We have lp:~patrick-crews/drizzle/qp-merge2 sitting in the Branch
Merge Proposal list on Launchpad.
It is 166905 lines, which is just over 10% of the existing 1431202 lines.
I only really noticed it's huge size when I was trying to run the
merge last week while I was in Australia, and BZR had taken over 10
minutes before I aborted it.
On the other hand, it appears that the existing dbqp is itself nearly as big.
It appears to me that kewpie contains code to also test stock MySQL
and to test Percona server. While I am a fan of putting the test code
in-tree (it certainly makes parts of my own Drizzle work much easier),
I have hesitations about carrying around the weight of test code for
other projects as well.
Any thoughts about my concerns? Or should I just suck it up and merge it?
..m
Hi. It is pretty darned huge as it has the randgen + sql-bench in there
as well as tests, etc and I was wondering about this myself.
Here are two suggestions:
1) I can remove the Percona stuff. Apologies for not having done it
sooner, but I was thinking some tests would prove useful over time, like
the cluster_* and xtrabackup_* suites. However, a fair bit of this
won't be needed.
2) We've been discussing this for Percona projects: Have the test
code live outside the tree and simply keep a config file in the drizzle
tree that says things like "I am a drizzle server. This is my basedir.
Run these suites, etc"
I'll have an updated branch with #1 done tomorrow. Let me know what you
guys think about #2.
--
Patrick
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
