Okay. Do what you think is best. I had to head out early to help my brother
take care of stuff in advance of flooding in Bismarck. I won't be able to do
anything with this until probably Tuesday of next week.
On May 26, 2011 3:16 PM, "Chapuis Bertil" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think it's good to remove the src/site and the forrest doc from the
0.1.x
> branch.
>
> For the trunk and the website, I think the maven site plugin is really
good.
> That's why I started to create the "src/site" folders and moved a part of
> the current documentation in apt files. This format is simple to
understand
> and should facilitate the documentation work. You can generate the site
with
> "mvn site" and the result is stored in "target/site".
>
> On 26 May 2011 18:41, Richard Frovarp <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Looking at a couple of other projects (Maven & Tika), they do have
>> src/site's in their releases. However, where they are present, they do
have
>> content.
>>
>>
>> On 05/26/2011 11:36 AM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
>>
>>> Those probably should be removed. Looking at them, the src/site don't
>>> have any content in them, just css, images, and a placeholder content
>>> file that only has the license.
>>>
>>> I also noticed that droids-[solr|spring|wicket] have a src/documentation
>>> directory and those just have boilerplate documentation as well.
>>>
>>> For the purposes of this release, I've removed those directories from
>>> the 0.1.x branch. Is this overstepping?
>>>
>>> One thing that does need to be worked on soon is the website. But given
>>> all of these changes, I'm not quite sure what the update strategy is.
>>>
>>> On 05/26/2011 01:55 AM, Chapuis Bertil wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for your work. I noticed you removed the maven site from
the
>>>> trunk (src/site). The modules also have a site folder (core/src/site).
Do
>>>> you want me to remove them? Or do you intentionally kept them?
>>>>
>>>> On 26 May 2011 05:03, Richard Frovarp<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> RC2 is up for review. I'll call a vote sometime soon (Tomorrow or
>>>>> Friday),
>>>>> I don't want to find something and have to abort another vote. I have
>>>>> figured out how to have maven behave and create a branch and work
>>>>> from that
>>>>> idea. So I've created a 0.1.x branch. Let the 0.2.0 goodness proceed
on
>>>>> trunk and it won't affect getting this release done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please check the release out to make sure everything is good. The
source
>>>>> file is clean, everything has signatures that pass, md5s, sha1s,
>>>>> NOTICEs,
>>>>> and LICENSEs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since last time:
>>>>>
>>>>> Extra modules removed
>>>>> Docs removed
>>>>> NOTICE and LICENSE consolidated and at source root
>>>>> Everything passes RAT now
>>>>> The source release is clean
>>>>> Patch to fix crawl depth applied
>>>>>
>>>>> Source tag (r1127762)
>>>>>
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/
>>>>>
>>>>> Maven staging repo:
>>>>>
>>>>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-011/
>>>>>
>>>>> Source release:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~rfrovarp/droids/
>>>>>
>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 3698A2B1):
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bertil Chapuis
> Agimem Sàrl
> http://www.agimem.com
