Since you removed the doc files, for me, everything is fine for the release. The documentation work will take place on the trunk and affect 0.0.2. Thanks a lot for your great work!
On 27 May 2011 07:02, Richard Frovarp <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay. Do what you think is best. I had to head out early to help my > brother > take care of stuff in advance of flooding in Bismarck. I won't be able to > do > anything with this until probably Tuesday of next week. > On May 26, 2011 3:16 PM, "Chapuis Bertil" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think it's good to remove the src/site and the forrest doc from the > 0.1.x > > branch. > > > > For the trunk and the website, I think the maven site plugin is really > good. > > That's why I started to create the "src/site" folders and moved a part of > > the current documentation in apt files. This format is simple to > understand > > and should facilitate the documentation work. You can generate the site > with > > "mvn site" and the result is stored in "target/site". > > > > On 26 May 2011 18:41, Richard Frovarp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Looking at a couple of other projects (Maven & Tika), they do have > >> src/site's in their releases. However, where they are present, they do > have > >> content. > >> > >> > >> On 05/26/2011 11:36 AM, Richard Frovarp wrote: > >> > >>> Those probably should be removed. Looking at them, the src/site don't > >>> have any content in them, just css, images, and a placeholder content > >>> file that only has the license. > >>> > >>> I also noticed that droids-[solr|spring|wicket] have a > src/documentation > >>> directory and those just have boilerplate documentation as well. > >>> > >>> For the purposes of this release, I've removed those directories from > >>> the 0.1.x branch. Is this overstepping? > >>> > >>> One thing that does need to be worked on soon is the website. But given > >>> all of these changes, I'm not quite sure what the update strategy is. > >>> > >>> On 05/26/2011 01:55 AM, Chapuis Bertil wrote: > >>> > >>>> Thanks a lot for your work. I noticed you removed the maven site from > the > >>>> trunk (src/site). The modules also have a site folder (core/src/site). > Do > >>>> you want me to remove them? Or do you intentionally kept them? > >>>> > >>>> On 26 May 2011 05:03, Richard Frovarp<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> RC2 is up for review. I'll call a vote sometime soon (Tomorrow or > >>>>> Friday), > >>>>> I don't want to find something and have to abort another vote. I have > >>>>> figured out how to have maven behave and create a branch and work > >>>>> from that > >>>>> idea. So I've created a 0.1.x branch. Let the 0.2.0 goodness proceed > on > >>>>> trunk and it won't affect getting this release done. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please check the release out to make sure everything is good. The > source > >>>>> file is clean, everything has signatures that pass, md5s, sha1s, > >>>>> NOTICEs, > >>>>> and LICENSEs. > >>>>> > >>>>> Changes since last time: > >>>>> > >>>>> Extra modules removed > >>>>> Docs removed > >>>>> NOTICE and LICENSE consolidated and at source root > >>>>> Everything passes RAT now > >>>>> The source release is clean > >>>>> Patch to fix crawl depth applied > >>>>> > >>>>> Source tag (r1127762) > >>>>> > >>>>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/ > >>>>> > >>>>> Maven staging repo: > >>>>> > >>>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-011/ > >>>>> > >>>>> Source release: > >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~rfrovarp/droids/ > >>>>> > >>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 3698A2B1): > >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Bertil Chapuis > > Agimem Sàrl > > http://www.agimem.com > -- Bertil Chapuis Agimem Sàrl http://www.agimem.com
