On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 05:52:28PM +0100, Graham Triggs wrote:
> I'm actually not a fan of the Closed status. Having worked with Jira in a
> number of cases where I've needed to re-organise issues after they've been
> worked on - either to add some additional categorisation, re-organisation of
> projects, clearing of remaining estimates for reporting purposes - having
> items in Closed just causes problems in having to re-open them in order to
> move them around.
> 
> Of course, there are swings and roundabouts - having Closed items prevents
> people from accidentally affecting the contents - but my experience has been
> that Closed isn't that useful. Our needs may well be different though.
> 
> If we want to make a distinction between something being fixed, and being
> reviewed, we don't have to use Closed - we could always introduced an
> 'Accepted' status that we transition resolved items to once confirmed. Or
> introduce [an optional] 'Review' status prior to resolved. There are always
> options.

Closing could be part of the release process.  When a fix is
incorporated into a release, the issue should be closed.  To revisit it
after a release, a new issue should be linked to the old.  But I
wouldn't want to do that without an intermediate "reviewed" state.

I think the important states to distinguish are:

o  we have an issue.

o  someone is working on it.  Others should either avoid duplicate
   effort or contact the assignee to offer help and receive
   coordination.

o  assignee thinks the work is done.

o  fix is independently tested and judged to work.

o  fix is in a release.

It would be nice if the tool could also help us track *where* in SCM
space the fix is incorporated.  That is, if it affects several
branches, have all known affected branches (and the trunk) been fixed?

-- 
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer   mw...@iupui.edu
Balance your desire for bells and whistles with the reality that only a 
little more than 2 percent of world population has broadband.
        -- Ledford and Tyler, _Google Analytics 2.0_

Attachment: pgpDMOxd98qjj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel

Reply via email to