On Friday, May 18, 2012, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 04:36:04PM -0700, Mark Diggory wrote:
> > Tim,
> >
> > Given that you have experience with this, what do you think the Rights
> > schema might look like for Embargo?
> >
> > <rights:RightsDeclarationMD xmlns:rights="
> > http://cosimo.stanford.edu/sdr/metsrights/"<
> http://cosimo.stanford.edu/sdr/metsrights/>
> > RIGHTSCATEGORY="LICENSED">
> > <rights:Context CONTEXTCLASS="GENERAL PUBLIC">
> > <rights:Permissions DISCOVER="true" DISPLAY="true" MODIFY="false"
> > DELETE="false" />
> > </rights:Context>
> > </rights:RightsDeclarationMD>
>
> You addressed this to Tim, but if I may butt in: it has to be
> translated back to Embargo or we lose information. So the question
> that we need to answer is: how do we express embargo intervals in METS?
MarkW, yes the PREMIS sections go inside the mets AIP and are associated
with the appropriate DSO.
Mark
--
[image: @mire Inc.]
*Mark Diggory *(Schedule a Meeting <https://tungle.me/markdiggory>)
*2888 Loker Avenue East, Suite 305, Carlsbad, CA. 92010*
*Esperantolaan 4, Heverlee 3001, Belgium*
http://www.atmire.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel