On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Mark H. Wood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > MarkW, yes the PREMIS sections go inside the mets AIP and are associated
> > with the appropriate DSO.
>
> Well, yes, of course, but how do we represent that the (negative)
> permission is derived from an embargo agreement? If the permission is
> a local policy then admin.s can alter it at will; but an embargo expresses
> some other organization's policy and can't be altered without
> negotiation. The AIP must express (machine-readably) *why* the policy
> is present, or we have lost important information.
The current strategy in IDEAS is not a negative permission:
Bitstream --> ResourcePolicy ( "READ", "Anonymous", StartDate:20150101,
EndDate:null, Item Access will not be enabled until StartDate due to
request from publisher")
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel
