-----Original Message----- From: Andrea Schweer [mailto:schw...@waikato.ac.nz] Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2013 9:05 a.m.
> The problem is that DSpace (XMLUI) could be considered broken when it comes > to that: it behaves differently for requests it considers to come from bots > vs other requests. For bot requests, it uses the item's last modified date; > for other requests, it uses the date that the item page was last cached IIRC. Forgive me, I'm probably missing something. I'm curious why it would behave differently in terms of caching. Can anyone explain the rationale? Cheers Hugh Barnes Digital Access Coordinator Library, Teaching and Learning Lincoln University Christchurch New Zealand p +64 3 321 8924 | f +64 3 325 2944 ________________________________ P Please consider the environment before you print this email. "The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) may be confidential and/or subject to copyright. Any unauthorised use, distribution, or copying of the contents is expressly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender by return e-mail or telephone and then delete this e-mail together with all attachments from your system." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
