On Thu, 13 May 2010 09:56:00 -0700 Bradley Giesbrecht <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On May 13, 2010, at 2:07 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 May 2010 21:07:51 -0700 > > Bradley Giesbrecht <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I am new to dspam and have a very old and spammy test account with a > >> mail delivery path like so: > >> postfix-transport -> dspam -> dovecot-deliver > >> > >> The postfix transport is only used for my test account which is a 10+ > >> year old email account that is all spam. > >> This is what I'm seeing in all the headers for this account. > >> > >> X-Dspam-Result: Innocent > >> X-Dspam-Processed: Tue May 11 08:14:32 2010 > >> X-Dspam-Confidence: 0.9897 > >> X-Dspam-Probability: -1.0000 > >> X-Dspam-Signature: 4be97458584691392213175 > >> > > A probability of -1.0000 is an uncalcalculated probability. Do you > > get that minus probability on all mails you process with DSPAM or > > only on some mails? > > Yes, all the emails I have looked at (100+ emails over ) over 3 days > have X-Dspam-Probability: -1.0000. > A probability of -1.0000 is nothing else then DSP_UNCALCULATED which is the initial value when DSPAM is initializing the DSPAM context. The funny thing is that the confidence in your case is not 0.0000, which would be the inital value for the confidence when initializing DSPAM context. So something at least is done by DSPAM but it is not finished. Is it possible for you to post the result of "dspam --version"? And if possible attach dspam.conf and your main.cf and master.cf? You can/should mask passwords in those files, because I don't need them. And if possible: Could you turn on debugging in DSPAM and post some additional log entries while DSPAM is processing messages? > The X-Dspam-Confidence seems to all be the same as well. > A number but not all of the emails "From: [email protected]" and "To: > [email protected] > " have X-Dspam-Result: Whitelisted. > This just means that you got a certain amount of mails from [email protected] sent to [email protected] which where not SPAM and DSPAM whitelisted [email protected]. > I have not imported a corpus from anywhere although from my reading > this is suggested by some. > Don't import corpi if you don't mind doing some initial training in the beginning. It is always better to do it without corpus feed. > Thank you, > Bradley Giesbrecht -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
